Doctors take 6 months to diagnose Lyme disease

July 16, 2008

The usual ‘doctors failed to diagnose my child’ story from the Daily Mail. The headline says it all:

Schoolgirl may be paralysed by disease that mother diagnosed on internet after doctors left baffled for six months

The 13 year old girl with a chronic headache, vertigo and photophobia was finally diagnosed with Lyme Disease.

‘She was diagnosed with Epstein-bar virus [her mother says], without the glandular fever. Then meningitis, then the psychiatrist comment was the best one.

‘They even suggested it could be a clot or a tumour at one point, which was worrying.’

All sensible differentials one might think. Lyme disease is very rare (see below) and without a history of a characteristic rash, bites or travel to more prevalent regions, most doctors would not consider it as a differential diagnosis – but that wouldn’t make a very good headline.

Incidence of Lyme disease (a little out of date!)

Entry Filed under: clinical errors. Tags: , , , , .

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. anna  |  July 19, 2008 at 6:54 pm

    Hi,

    just to point out that your charts arnt really effective. The increase in ticks due to temperature rises isnt down to the summer temperatures, which as your graphs shows hasnt really shown a steady increase over time.

    Tick numbers and thus incidences of Lyme Disease are increasing because of milder winters. Cold weather kills off the ticks at a younger point in their life cycle, the less freezing our winters are, the more ticks survive to pass on the disease.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Most recent posts

Top Posts

Blogroll